W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12637] New: Use of partial-apply() and some smaller bugs in HOF cases

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:44:23 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-12637-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12637

           Summary: Use of partial-apply() and some smaller bugs in HOF
                    cases
           Product: XML Query Test Suite
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XML Query Test Suite
        AssignedTo: benjie.nguyen@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: peter.fischer@inf.ethz.ch
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


When looking at the latest CVS version of the XQTS, I noticed some issues in
the HOF cases:

The most import one is that partial-apply() is used in several HOF cases, even
though the latest public XQuery 3.0 says that is has been replaced by the use
of '?'. Affected test cases include hof-027, hof-040 to -045, hof-912, hof-915
to hof-918

There are also some minor bugs:

1) Many test cases include an XML declaration, even though the result is not
valid XML, e.g. hof-001
Expected: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>3, should be 3


2) hof-003 uses a location hint to import a module. This should be replaced or
amended by a module specification in the catalog

3) hof-033, -034 and -035 expect 'uppercase' (as the function name), but
fn:upppercase should also be accepted

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 09:44:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:12 GMT