W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2011

[Bug 12535] [DM] Definition of 'tree' missing and apparently non-standard

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:00:16 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QRhHk-0000hS-Ff@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12535

--- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-06-01 09:00:09 UTC ---
Well, personally I find the statement that every node belongs to exactly one
tree leaves little room for doubt. But there's always scope for making things
clearer, especially for readers who come to the spec with a different idea
about what the words mean and need those preconceptions to be corrected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 09:00:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:12 GMT