W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11682] under-specification of func-available-environment-variables and unc-available-environment-variable

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:00:15 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PbLI7-00036R-6n@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11682

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-01-07 23:00:14 UTC ---
The under-specification is to some extent deliberate: Like the doc() and
collection() functions, these functions access information from the external
environment (or context), and the specification is therefore deliberately
written in abstract terms, since different environments will inevitably differ.
We do explain in a non-normative note that the intent is that they should
correspond to operating system environment variables if that's a meaningful
concept. There's nothing to stop implementors deciding to map the concept to
something other than operating system variables if they choose; for example,
they could simply access command line parameters, or properties from some
product-specific configuration file.

You're right to point out that the F+O specification assumed that "environment
variables" would be added to the description of the dynamic context, and that
this proposed addition has not been implemented. We should fix that.

You're also right that the description could be clearer about whether the set
of environment variables is expected to be stable for the duration of a
query/transformation. The way the notes are written suggests that the WG did
not intend to require stability, but this doesn't seem to be stated
normatively.

The note that says external functions may modify the values of variables is
referring of course to the possibility that external functions may be
non-deterministic, and should perhaps say so.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 23:00:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:45 UTC