W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2011

[Bug 12173] New: Do we need [err:XQST0036] in-scope schema definitions of the importing module?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:45:31 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-12173-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12173

           Summary: Do we need [err:XQST0036]  in-scope schema definitions
                    of the importing module?
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Working drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XQuery 3.0
        AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
        ReportedBy: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


In our resolution of Bug 11095, we decided to add schema components to the data
model, and require implementations to know derivations contained in the data
model schema.

We could make a similar decision for imported modules. [err:XQST0036] is raised
if the type of an imported variable referenced in the importing module, or a
parameter type or result type of an imported function referenced in the
importing module, is not contained in the ISSD of the importing module.

We could eliminate this error condition, putting the burden on implementations
rather than users.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 15:45:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:45 UTC