- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:02:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14921 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-12-10 19:02:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > My only quibble with this is the implication that "an implementation that > supports XML 1.1" cannot also support XML 1.0. This sentence seems to impose > some kind of obligation, which has not previously been present, for processors > to support one or the other but not both. The specification currently says this: <quote src="Appendix D"> The following items in this specification are implementation-defined: ... 6. Whether the implementation is based on the rules of [XML 1.0] and [XML Names] or the rules of [XML 1.1] and [XML Names 1.1]. One of these sets of rules must be applied consistently by all aspects of the implementation. If the implementation is based on the rules of [XML 1.0], the edition used must be at least Third Edition; the edition used is implementation-defined, but we recommend that implementations use the latest version. </quote> I believe the specification already has the requirement you claim was not previously present. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2011 19:02:56 UTC