- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:36:08 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10534 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-09-30 17:36:08 UTC --- My own feeling is that your proposed rewording is what was intended, and is the only reading that makes sense. However, the presence of test case tunnelparam20_015_01 means that changing the wording is not necessarily the right thing to do. At the meeting today, the WG asked for implementor (or user) feedback as to how existing products handle this situation. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 17:36:10 UTC