W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10865] New: [XQuery11] Why do we allow implementations to declare their own annotations in the fn namespace?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:01:18 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10865-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10865

           Summary: [XQuery11] Why do we allow implementations to declare
                    their own annotations in the fn namespace?
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XQuery 1.1
        AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
        ReportedBy: oliver@cbcl.co.uk
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
             Group: XSLXQuery_WG


4.15 states:

mplementations can add their own annotations, which should not be in the fn
namespace.

Why does this say "should" and not "must".

If this is for forwards compatability, or compatibility with scripting/update
then should there not be a note stating this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 16:01:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:06 GMT