W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10789] New: [XPath21] Example production rule needs updating

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:39:32 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10789-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10789

           Summary: [XPath21] Example production rule needs updating
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
          Platform: All
               URL: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xqu
                    ery-11/html/xpath-21.html#id-introduction
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P4
         Component: XPath 2.1
        AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
        ReportedBy: andrew_coleman@uk.ibm.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
             Group: XSLXQuery_WG


In the introduction, the syntax of production rules is explained using the
following example...

[57]       FunctionCall       ::=       EQName ArgumentList

The explanatory text that follows this doesn't match the rule itself (because
rule 57 had changed since XPath 2.0).  The text could be changed to match the
rule, but I think a better example is needed here to illustrate the concepts. 
For example, rule 47 is a closer fit to the existing text...

[47]       ArgumentList       ::=       "(" (Argument ("," Argument)*)? ")"

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 08:39:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:06 GMT