W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 10876] [XQuery11] Is it valid to have conflicting private functions in two different modules?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:08:54 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PDJPq-0007ew-Br@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10876

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-11-02 16:08:54 UTC ---
The Working Group agrees to the intent fo the following paragraph:

It is a static error if the expanded QName and arity of a public function
declared in an imported module are respectively equal to the expanded QName and
arity of a function declared in the importing module or the expanded QName and
arity of a public function declared in in another imported module (even if the
declarations are consistent) [err:XQST0034].


It may be edited ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 16:08:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:08 GMT