W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9327] fn-datamixedcontent-1

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:08:12 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NvKVY-0008HI-7o@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9327


Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdyck@ibiblio.org




--- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>  2010-03-27 01:08:11 ---
(a) An implementation that does not support the Static Typing Feature will
yield an xs:untypedAtomic value as you say.

(b) An implementation that supports the STF based on 1st edition FS will,
during Static Type Analysis, infer a static type of xs:untypedAtomic for the
query, and then proceed as in (a).

(c) An implementation that supports the STF based on 2nd edition FS will,
during Static Type Analysis, fail to infer a static type for the fn:data()
call, and instead raise FOTY0012.

The test-case's expected result only admits (c).

If we augment the expected result to admit (a), it will also admit (b), and the
test-case will cease to have much point. (It certainly would no longer reflect
the resolution of 4273 in any useful way.)

Instead, perhaps we should simply move the test-case into the StaticTyping
test-group, where (as I understand it), the expected results don't have to
reflect the behaviour of an implementation that does not support the STF. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2010 01:08:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:59 GMT