- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:50:57 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10207 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-07-20 15:50:57 --- The underlying reason for the clumsy specification of schema-element(X) is that the only information we can base the decision on, in terms of XDM node properties, is the element name, the type annotation, and the isNilled property. >My personal opinion is that the rules should be equivalent to those in schema I don't think schema has any direct analogue of schema-element(X). Which rules were you thinking of? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:50:59 UTC