W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [Bug 6732] [Ser] Make clear for which values of version parameter the serialization recommendation provides normative definitions

From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:46:07 -0600
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20100704124336.08c57328@oracle.com>
To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
We do not have the resources to republish the Errata documents, much 
less the PER documents, every time we fix a bug.  At some point, when 
we have accumulated enough changes that the WG decides that the 
cost/benefit ratio is suitable, we'll republish the appropriate 
Errata documents.  We will almost certainly NOT publish a revised PER 
document, but will instead publish the Edited Recommendation (second 
edition) document; that, however, cannot happen until a few more 
milestones have been reached.

Hope this helps,
    Jim

At 7/4/2010 09:52 AM, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6732
>
>
>Franklin Tse <peaceable_whale@hotmail.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|CLOSED                      |REOPENED
>                  CC|                            |peaceable_whale@hotmail.com
>          Resolution|FIXED                       |
>
>
>
>
>--- Comment #4 from Franklin Tse 
><peaceable_whale@hotmail.com>  2010-07-04 15:52:56 ---
>(In reply to comment #2)
> > As a number of XSL WG members do not regularly attend the joint XSL/XQuery
> > teleconference, I asked the XSL WG to confirm the decision from the joint
> > teleconference.  The XSL WG did so at its teleconference of 30 
> April, 2009.
> > [Member-only link to minutes
> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2009Apr/0073.html>.]
> > This will be erratum SE.E12.
> > Jirka, as you originated the enhancement request in Bug 6129 (which XSL and
> > XQuery still will consider for a future version of the Serialization
> > Recommendation), could I ask you to confirm that this erratum against
> > Serialization 1.0 is a satisfactory interim solution for HTML 5.0?
>
>Although the comment above stated that the XSL WG has fixed this issue as
>erratum SE.E12, Errata for XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization
><http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/qt-errata/xslt-xquery-serialization-errata.html>
>has not been updated and there is no new PER for XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0
>Serialization (Second Edition) since April 2009. What is the current status of
>this issue?
>
>--
>Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You are the QA contact for the bug.

========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144
   Chair, W3C XML Query WG; XQX (etc.) editor       Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =
=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =
=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =
========================================================================  
Received on Sunday, 4 July 2010 22:05:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:04 GMT