W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2010

[Bug 9600] [XQuery] Importing schema with a simple type conflicting with a function declaration.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:31:39 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1O7XaN-0003Yu-MT@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9600


Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jmdyck@ibiblio.org




--- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>  2010-04-29 17:31:39 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> I suggest that the above text should be modified to include also the case where
> "an imported function has arity 1 and has an expanded QName which is equal to
> the expanded QName of an atomic type defined in a schema imported by the
> importing module".

Rather than going to that level of detail, we could use the concept of
'constructor functions', e.g., add a clause about functions "implicitly defined
by a schema import in the importing module".

Another approach would be to avoid listing the various places where a function
could come from, and just refer to the 'function signatures' component of the
static context.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:31:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:42 UTC