W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2009

[Bug 6325] [DM] Type Hierarchy diagram confusing

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:36:03 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1N2o5b-0000VT-6Y@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6325


Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jim.melton@acm.org
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #2 from Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>  2009-10-27 15:36:02 ---
After considerable reflection, the WGs decided not to make any changes to the
type hierarchy diagrams (in either the Data Model document or the Functions and
Operators document) with respect to the 2007 Recommendations for XQuery 1.0 and
XPath 2.0.  The WGs do not believe that it makes sense to revise the diagram
retroactively for the Recommendations.  Therefore, I'm marking the bug
RESOLVED/WONTFIX (for the Recommendations) and trust that you are willing to
mark the bug CLOSED. 

However, we have taken positive action for the XQuery 1.1 and XPath 2.1 drafts
by splitting the diagram into three diagrams (one for "item", one for
"xs:anyType", and the last for "xs:anyAtomicType"), with arrows "pointing" from
derived types "up" to the types from which they are derived. 

Hope this helps.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 15:36:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:41 UTC