http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8219 Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oliver@cbcl.co.uk --- Comment #2 from Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> 2009-11-06 20:00:45 --- Let me summarize the effects of the two interpretations: Interpretation 1: a) If the source node has a relative xml:base attribute then the base URI is computed with this uri resolved against the uri of the xsl:copy instruction. The xml:base attribute itself is not copied. b) Otherwise the base URI of the source node is used. c) xml:base attributes that appear in the copied node are ignored for purposes of computing the node's base URI. Interpretation 2: a) If the copied node has an xml:base attribute then this is resolved against the base URI of the xsl:copy instruction. b) Otherwise the base URI of the source node is used. Surely the intention of this sentence was interpretation 2 and it was just poorly worded? If the intention was indeed interpretation 1, then what was the justification for adding this condition? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 20:00:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 November 2009 20:00:54 GMT