- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:34:53 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6531
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-05-26 14:34:53 ---
This is classed as editorial, so I am proposing to fix it using editorial
discretion.
I've added text for the next version of Functions and Operators that mentions
the use of this special-case notation for concat:
"One function, <code>fn:concat</code>, has a variable number of arguments (two
or more). More strictly, there is an infinite set of functions having the name
<code>fn:concat</code>, with arity ranging from 2 to infinity. For this special
case, a single function signature is given, with an ellipsis indicating an
indefinite number of arguments."
I don't think there's a need to formalize it any further than this. The meaning
is clear.
If you can accept this resolution, I would be grateful if you would mark it as
closed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 14:35:06 UTC