W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2009

[Bug 6809] [FT] Test Suite - Thesaurus Queries

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:16:51 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1M0x6J-000783-9O@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6809





--- Comment #8 from Pat Case <pcase@crs.loc.gov>  2009-05-04 12:16:50 ---
Christian,

[3] ft-3.4.3-examples-q3.xq

Yes, this is fine as well. A minor issue: it should be rewritten from 

    <term>Merrygould</term>
    <synonym>
      <term></term>
      <relationship>Marigold</relationship>
    </synonym>

...to...

    <term>Merrygould</term>
    <synonym>
      <term>Marigold</term>
      <relationship>sounds like</relationship>
    </synonym>

--Done.

[9] thesaurus-queries-results-q5 / q5b / q6 / q6b

Instead, I would suggest to extend the "spellcheck.xml" file similar to the
"soundex.xml" file; otherwise the logics of this thesaurus is opposite to the
other ones. An example..

a) "users" ftcontains "people" with thesaurus at "usability.xml"
     relationship "NT"

  <term>people</term>
  <synonym>
    <term>users</term>
    <relationship>NT</relationship>
  </synonym>

  -> true


b) "succesful" ftcontains "sucessfull" with thesaurus at "spellcheck.xml"
     relationship "misspelling of"

  <term>successful</term>
  <synonym>
    <term>sucessfull</term>
    <relationship>misspelling of</relationship>
  </synonym>

  -> false...


--Done.

Pat Case


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 12:17:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:57 GMT