http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6946 Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmdyck@ibiblio.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-06-08 16:34:59 --- > Indeed the "ftusecases.xml" documents contains the substring "task?", > "specialist.", and "next?". However, if the full-text tokenizer interprets > periods as sentence delimiters, and not as parts of tokens, the periods will > not be passed on to the wildcard evaluator. This is why both of the following > queries > > "task?" ftcontains "task?", > "task?" ftcontains "task?" with wildcards > > will lead to the internal comparison "task" <-> "task?", and will both return > false. But note that tokenization is applied, not just to the search item, but also to the query strings. If the latter's tokenization also interprets punctuation as token-delimiters, then the internal comparison will be "task" <-> "task" and the queries will return true. By the way, did you intend "with wildcards" for cases [2] and [3]? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 16:35:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 June 2009 16:35:07 GMT