http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6131 --- Comment #18 from John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> 2009-07-09 13:27:59 --- (In reply to comment #16) > We already use pseudo-functions for NameTests, e.g. > > element(customer) > > Why not use a similar notation for expanded names? Because that doesn't work at all well for variable, function or template names. Java allows the use of package qualified class names, and I think XQuery and XSLT would benefit from adding a way to fully qualify identifiers with their namespace. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 13:28:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 July 2009 13:28:08 GMT