- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:00:45 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6131
--- Comment #13 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-07-09 11:00:44 ---
So, would Clark names work?
They would certainly work in XPath, which does not currently use curlies for
anything else.
In XSLT there would have to be a rule for their use in attribute value
templates: probably simply that if the XPath expression starts with an
open-curly, then it must be preceded by a space. For example, code="{
{uri}local }".
In XQuery there's a risk of clashing with existing uses of curly braces.
EnclosedExpr would need a similar rule to the XSLT rule above. Most other
places that currently use a curly, it's a follow-on to something like text{} or
validate{}, and these cases may be OK. However, there's a major clash with
scripting, which has
Block ::= "{" BlockDecls BlockBody "}"
which is clearly incompatible.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 11:00:54 UTC