- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:10:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-01-29 09:10:24 ---
>W.R.T. the question about issuing a 1.0 erratum: We do not anticipate actually publishing another set of 1.0 errata documents, but will shortly initiate processing of the 2ed documents to PER status. However, some participants have requested that the Erratum entry be created anyway for technical reasons.
I think we want traceability from the second edition documents back to the
Bugzilla entries, and by far the easiest way of doing that is to publish an
Errata document for the first edition that is synchronized with the second
edition. That's what the system was set up to achieve, after all.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 09:10:34 UTC