http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6513 --- Comment #14 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-04-19 03:28:58 --- (In reply to comment #11) > > > "The given schema type may be "in-scope" (defined in the in-scope > > schema definitions), or "out-of-scope" (not defined in the in-scope > > schema definitions). > > I don't think this "in-scope", "out-of-scope" distinction adds clarity. > Nothing in the specification of our language depends on this distinction. I don't understand how you can say this when several errors (XPST0008, XQST0034, XQST0036, XPST0051, XQDY0084) are raised depending on whether or not a particular name is defined in the in-scope schema definitions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Sunday, 19 April 2009 03:29:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 19 April 2009 03:29:11 GMT