- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:00:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5696
Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tim@cbcl.co.uk
--- Comment #3 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2008-10-28 13:00:12 ---
Haskell has type classes, described at
http://www.haskell.org/tutorial/classes.html
which seem like a very well designed way of describing the sort of constraints
on types suggested by Option 2. This might be a useful addition to XQuery.
As an off-topic aside, I'm personally a bit wary of try ... catch. I've got a
horrible feeling I'm turning into a functional purist. Even element
constructors make me feel queazy :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 13:00:26 UTC