http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5684 andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com |frans.englich@telia.com ------- Comment #1 from andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com 2008-05-15 20:02 ------- We ran into this issue long ago. My recollection is that agreed to use explicit timezones in most of our test cases, and to use Z as the expected value of the implicit timezone in just a small number of the test cases. Perhaps I recall wrongly, or perhaps we changed this over time. I went looking for precedent, and found that in fn-implicit-timezone-2 that we expect "-PT5H" and the comparator is Inspect.Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 20:03:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 May 2008 20:03:07 GMT