http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5795 --- Comment #6 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2008-06-26 12:04:05 --- > I don't see how that holds. I'd say that just because an expression raise an > error, doesn't make it ok to rewrite to function fn:error. We only do this wtih dynamic errors. Why wouldn't this rewrite be valid? Could a user see a difference between an expression raising an error and a call to fn:error? Does anyone else have an opinion on this? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 12:04:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 June 2008 12:04:39 GMT