http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5459 --- Comment #21 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2008-07-31 21:46:13 --- (In reply to comment #20) > These type checking rules agree with our implementation except your definition > of base atomic type for xs:dayTimeDuration and xs:yearMonthDuration is > xs:duration Whoops! I forgot that those two aren't primitive. Thanks for catching that. Your suggested alterations look fine. > If the concept of base atomic type is being added anyway, then is it worth > using it in place of base numeric type for abs, etc. ? Yeah, I was thinking of doing that. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:46:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:46:51 GMT