W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2008

[Bug 5393] CVS: fn-doc-available-4 and xml:id errors

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:44:25 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JFqa9-0000uq-RB@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5393

           Summary: CVS: fn-doc-available-4 and xml:id errors
           Product: XML Query Test Suite
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XML Query Test Suite
        AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
        ReportedBy: tim@cbcl.co.uk
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


fn-doc-available-4 is described as a test which checks that a document with an
invalid xml:id attribute is flagged.

Quoting xml:id version 1.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-id/#dt-xml-id-error)

"An xml:id error is a non-fatal error that occurs when an xml:id processor
finds that a document has violated the constraints of this specification."

"A violation of the constraints in this specification results in an xml:id
error. Such errors are not fatal, but should be reported by the xml:id
processor. In the interest of interoperability, it is strongly recommended that
xml:id errors not be silently ignored."

It seems to me from the above that failing an xml:id constraint will not
necessarily cause the document to be considered as not available.  That said, a
mechanism for catching an xml:id error in XQuery would, I presume, be
implementation defined.

More generally, is it a requirement that a document loaded with fn:doc
(directly, or indirectly via fn:doc-available):
1.  Perform xml:id processing?
2.  Perform DTD processing if a DOCTYPE is included?
3.  Perform XML Schema validation if a schema is referenced?
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 12:44:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:49 GMT