http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5351 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-08 21:59 ------- Just a reminder that whoever drafts the erratum on this should add an entry to the XPath 1.0 backwards compatibility appendix. In XPath 1.0, (and in XPath 2.0 until today), processing-instruction('123abc'), like @comment(), was a legitimate if perverse way of denoting the empty node-set.Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 21:59:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:49 GMT