W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2008

[Bug 4709] [FT] editorial: 3.3.5 Stop Word Option

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:59:44 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JQH1U-0004iY-Ie@wiggum.w3.org>


jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org  2008-02-16 06:59 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> [4b] No change. FTTF believes that the note is accurate.

I don't think that answers my concern. Do you agree and intend that it's a
license for a Full-Text processor to behave non-conformantly? Is a processor
required to answer correctly or not?

Is this the kind of Note that's a not-immediately-obvious consequence of some
normative statements? If so, which ones?
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 06:59:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:35 UTC