http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5459 ------- Comment #3 from oliver@cbcl.co.uk 2008-02-13 15:00 ------- When I said xs:numeric I was referring to a union of the numeric types, which is how I had been (wrongly) treating the word "numeric" in the F+O declarations, and I agree that the rules for fn:abs, fn:ceiling, fn:floor, fn:round, and fn:round-half-to-even are fine. The functions fn:min, fn:max, fn:avg and fn:sum however are defined for xs:anyAtomicType*, and so this problem still occurs: If you have an argument of type (xs:integer | xs:double)*, then (as far as I can tell) the static analysis rules for these functions imply a return type of xs:double, when it could also be xs:integer.Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:00:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:00:44 GMT