Re: Wrong XQuery namespace URI in namespace document

Micah,

Many thanks for the report.  I am currently responsible for the 
namespace documents, so this is my problem to resolve.  I am in the 
process of overhauling the way that we produce the namespace 
documents, so it's going to take a few weeks before this is fixed, 
but it will get fixed.

Many thanks!
    Jim

At 8/14/2008 02:35 PM, Micah Dubinko wrote:
>The following two documents contain inline text that gives the 
>incorrect namespace URI (specifically, a trailing slash that should 
>not be there)
>
> > | * 
> <http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions>http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions
>
>"This document describes the namespace 
><http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/>http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ 
>of the..."
>
>
> > | * 
> <http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions>http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions
>
>"This document describes the namespace 
><http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions/>http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions/ 
>of the..."
>
>Both of these disagree with the normative definition from 
>/TR/xquery, and are confusing to developers who happen to visit the 
>namespace URI with a browser.
>
>This comment is about the specific content of the pages, not the 
>redirect structure (which I understand to be a limitation of the system).
>
>Thanks, -m

========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144
   Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; XQX (etc.) editor    Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =
=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =
=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =
======================================================================== 

Received on Thursday, 14 August 2008 23:13:30 UTC