http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5727 --- Comment #9 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-08-04 14:41:59 --- (1) The proposal in comment #8 does not address the problem that if these rules are adopted, / < 5 now parses in XPath but not in XQuery. Perhaps that's acceptable. (2) What about / instance of document-node(schema-element(x)) Are we saying this must be reported as a syntax error? I might be reluctant to implement that because I don't want to invalidate existing stylesheets - it's a perfectly reasonable thing to write, although I agree it's arguably illegal already (depends on what you think "keyword" means - I allow it because my parser recognizes "instance of" as a single token, which cannot appear at the start of a RelativePathExpr). Michael Kay -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 14:42:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 August 2008 14:42:37 GMT