http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5596 ------- Comment #1 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-04-26 01:35 ------- As I understand it, the rules of FS 7.2.5 are complete, and consistent with F+O 15.5.6, they just aren't as precise as they could be in the case where the argument's static type is empty. So unless that lack of precision causes serious problems, I don't think I can process this as an erratum. (Note that an implementation is free to infer the more precise type under FS 6.1.1 Static Typing Extensions.)Received on Saturday, 26 April 2008 01:35:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 26 April 2008 01:35:58 GMT