W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2007

[Bug 4735] [FT] editorial: E.3 XQueryX for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 example

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:17:56 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1I22gm-0006Au-JS@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4735

           Summary: [FT] editorial: E.3 XQueryX for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0
                    Full-Text 1.0 example
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Full Text
        AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
        ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


E.3 XQueryX for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 example

[1]
para 1
"The following examples ... For each example"
    There's only one example.

[2]
"we show the English description of the query"
    Actually, we don't.

[3]
"an XQueryX solution"
    s/XQueryX/Full-Text XQueryX/ ?

[4]
"and the XQuery Full-Text expression that results"
    s/expression/module/ (or "query")

[5]
"from applying the Full-Ttext XQueryX-to-XQuery Full-Text transformation"
    s/Ttext/Text/

[6]
"to the Full-Text XQueryX solution"
    It's odd: "Full-Text XQueryX" vs. "XQuery Full-Text".

[7]
"That produced XQuery Full-Text expression"
    s/That produced/The latter/

[8]
"The semantics of the Full-Text XQueryX ..."
    From here to the end of the para doesn't belong in an "example"
    section. Move it (or something like it) to E.
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:17:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:33 UTC