W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2007

[Bug 4733] [FT] editorial: E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:16:57 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1I22fp-00068Q-5l@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4733

           Summary: [FT] editorial: E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0
                    and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Full Text
        AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
        ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


E XML Syntax (XQueryX) for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0

[1]
"Because XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0 integrates seamlessly with
XQuery 1.0"
    I would say there's a visible seam where the two join.
    Delete "seamlessly".

[2]
'([XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text Requirements], section 4.3,
Composability, states that "XQuery/XPath Full-Text MUST be composable with
XQuery, and SHOULD be composable with itself.")'
    This is kind of clunky for a parenthetical remark. Delete it, I think.

[3]
"it follows that the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Full-Text 1.0
must integrate seamlessly with the XML Syntax for XQuery 1.0."
    This sentence is saying something like "because this spec satisfies
    requirement X, it therefore satisfies requirement Y". Is it the spec's
    job to point out how it comes to satisfy its requirements?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:16:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:33 UTC