W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2007

[Bug 4671] [Full text LC draft sec. 3.3.6] Why wild card options, not regular expressions?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:11:00 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1I0uLE-0002CV-0S@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4671

           Summary: [Full text LC draft sec. 3.3.6] Why wild card options,
                    not regular expressions?
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Last Call drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Full Text
        AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
        ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


In 3.3.6, you define wild card options. I am wondering why you are not reling
on on existing regular expression syntax like XML Schema regular expressions
and would propose to do so.
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 07:11:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:33 UTC