[Bug 4845] Do we need an error for "]]>" in replacement text? from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2007-07-10 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from July 2007)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:16:24 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
CC:
Message-Id: <E1I8OwS-0003Fj-T6@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4845





------- Comment #1 from davidc@nag.co.uk  2007-07-10 23:16 -------
I think that unlike the -- in comments case the ]]> restriction isn't a
restriction on values in the data model, so shouldn't concern update, it's just
that an xml serialisation needs to serialise ]]> as ]]&gt; or some such.

David

Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 23:16:27 UTC