http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5295 ------- Comment #4 from zongaro@ca.ibm.com 2007-12-19 21:24 ------- Sorry - I see that the first half of my comment #3 essentially restates what Michael Kay proposed in comment #1. But Michael Dyck's comment #2 is a very interesting one - XSLT 2.0 currently permits an item to be in more than one group, but I don't think the WG had considered that an item could end up in more groups than the number of grouping keys it has. It might not have been Michael's intent to permit it, but it wouldn't be unreasonable. To sum up, I have to admit that I'm finally convinced that xsl:for-each-group does have a problem. My apologies that my thought processes ended up taking up so much bandwidth.Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:24:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:22 GMT