http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3757 ------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2006-09-30 06:57 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > I don't think there is something wrong with the spec as is So you don't think the disagreement between definitions and example constitutes something wrong with the spec? > Being that late in the process, specific suggested text would be > greatly appreciated. Well, you could change "contain a complex value or a simple value" to "contain a sequence of attribute nodes followed by either a complex value or a simple value", and drop the attribute stuff from the defn of complex value. Note that "complex value" isn't used anywhere else, so there isn't a problem with changing its definition. That should take care of the definition/example disagreement. Not sure about the general mapping though.Received on Saturday, 30 September 2006 06:57:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:17 GMT