http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3758 ------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2006-09-27 07:14 ------- How can you choose not to revisit rules that clearly don't work? (Or do you think they do work? In which case, you should refute my example.) Removing the text about "preserving useful type information" is not a fix. It does not make the STA failure go away, and it leaves the (completely unmotivated) division of normalization into n=1 and n>1 cases.Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 07:15:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:17 GMT