- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:05:42 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1668
jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Comment #4 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2006-10-03 20:05 -------
The 2006-06 CR has a few errors relative to my suggestion:
In Norm / rule (1|2), *above* the '==',
[[ FormalReturnClause ]]_Expr
should be just
FormalReturnClause
In Norm / rule 1, below the '==', after
[[ Exprn ]]_Expr
insert "return".
In Norm / rule 2, below the '==', in
return Expr [[ FormalReturnClause ]]_Expr
delete the first 'Expr'.
Also:
You replaced my suggested symbol name 'FLWORExpr_or_return' with
'FormalReturnClause', which I don't think is an improvement. It would be a good
name for the
"return" Expr
phrase (if that needed a name), so isn't that great for the more general
FormalFLWORExpr | ("return" Expr)
How about 'FormalInnerFLWORExpr' or 'FormalFLWORExprInner'?
In [66 (Formal)] and throughout 4.8.*, each 'Expr' should really be an
'ExprSingle' (not including 'Expr' in []_Expr subscripts).
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 20:06:09 UTC