- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:42:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3790 ------- Comment #7 from per@bothner.com 2006-11-17 21:42 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I agree with Per about the results of copynamespace-9, 16, and 20: in each case > the result advocated by Per is the same as the result in CVS, so I'm not sure > where the issue lies. I think I somehow confused the expected and actual outputs. My apologies. Anyway, they're now the same. :-)
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 21:42:36 UTC