http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3818 ------- Comment #6 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-11-02 18:59 ------- In fact we explicitly decided to permit a broadening "treat as". There was a rule against it at one stage, and it placed a great and unnecessary burden on users to understand the static type inferencing. When I assert EXP treat as element(employee) I am asserting that EXP will always return an employee. I want the system to tell me if EXP doesn't return an employee, but I don't want it to reject my query because the system was able to work out for itself that EXP was an employee without my telling it.Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 18:59:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:18 GMT