- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:07:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1749
simeon@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #1 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-03-29 22:07 -------
Fixed as suggested. The answer to the second question is yes. Added
the following sentence to clarify:
<<
Static type analysis for this function should be performed as for a
built-in function declared with the given signature.
>>
- Jerome
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 22:08:54 UTC