RE: Types defines in F & O and WXS 1.1

> I think the simplest thing to do is to have XQuery adopt the XML
> Schema 1.1 names for these types. That would also simplify naming of
> types in XQuery.

I agree. The experience with the XMLSchema-datatypes namespace showed that
it's very troublesome to have two names for the same type. Changing it now
creates a discontinuity for users and implementors between CR and REC, but
that's going to be a lot easier to manage than a discontinuity later.

Michael Kay

Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 20:16:22 UTC