W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2006

RE: Types defines in F & O and WXS 1.1

From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:50:28 -0800
Message-ID: <BAE415CEAA831548800F68C44E905AF50462809E@RED-MSG-60.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Frans Englich" <frans.englich@telia.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

The original discussion (and I thought agreement) was that WXS 1.1 would
simply refer to the XQuery types (including namespaces) where
appropriate.

I have not looked at WXS 1.1 yet, but if that is not the case, then I
think there is a problem...

Speaking personally,
Michael 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frans Englich
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:56 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Types defines in F & O and WXS 1.1
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The draft version of 'XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes'[1] 
> adds the types 
> anyAtomicType, yearMonthDuration and dayTimeDuration.
> 
> I'm interested in knowing what's the broader plan with the 
> types in F & O and 
> WXS 1.1. Clearly, the addition of the types is to in some way 
> play nice with 
> the XQuery specifications.
> 
> Will there exist "two versions" of for example 
> dayTimeDuration, once the 
> related specifications have reached recommendation status? How is the 
> interaction between the two specifications planned to be, or 
> are there no 
> thoughts about that?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 		Frans
> 
> 1.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 17:50:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:42 GMT