- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:38:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3606
scott_boag@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #1 from scott_boag@us.ibm.com 2006-08-25 15:38 -------
> Is there any good reason why StringLiteral is classified as a non-delimiting
> symbol?
Not that I can see. In fact, I think it's contradicts """ and "'" being
delimiting characters. So, yes, I think this is a bug and should be fixed.
> Am I correct in saying that as the spec stands, the above line should be a
> syntax error?
I would let it pass, given my statement above that there is a contradiction.
>> There are other oddities in the list of non-delimiting symbols as well. For
>> example, it includes Char. This suggests that in the production rule
>>
>> [159] CommentContents ::= (Char+ - (Char* ('(:' >|
>> ':)') Char*))
>>
>> the Char tokens must be separated by whitespace, whereas of course the >>opposite
>> is true. I think that symbols that are used only in ws:explicit rules have no
>> place in this list.
I agree.
>> "." also requires a separator if it precedes or follows a
>> numeric literal.
I agree.
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 15:38:23 UTC