W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > August 2006

[Bug 3532] fn-collection tests

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:25:39 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1G8g0x-00044L-KJ@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3532


mike@saxonica.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |




------- Comment #18 from mike@saxonica.com  2006-08-03 16:25 -------
Thanks for the changes which are a great improvement.

One comment, however: the tests that use a default collection continue to use
"input-file" rather than "input-URI", and it's unclear how the test driver is
supposed to distinguish between

<input-file role="principal-data">collection2</input-file>

used in (say) fn-collection-10d, from

<input-file role="principal-data">works-mod</input-file>

used in externalcontextitem-22

I think the first case should be input-URI rather than input-file.

It would also be useful to distinguish between 

<input-URI role="principal-data"
variable="input-context">collection2</input-URI>

used in fn-collection-10, and

<input-URI role="principal-data" variable="input-context">works-mod</input-URI>

used in fn-doc-5; the test driver may need to treat document URIs and
collection URIs differently. The obvious way to achieve this would be to write
role="collection" in the case where a collection URI is used.
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2006 16:25:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:44 GMT