W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Error codes in XPath 2.0 specification

From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:57:39 -0800
To: Tom Emerson <tree@dreamersrealm.net>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF42C48815.A6A340D8-ON88256FC4.006237DA-88256FC4.0062A43E@us.ibm.com>
Hi Tom,
You are quite correct that the error codes listed in the Feb. 11 edition 
of the XQuery specification are lacking a required 2-digit type code. This 
inconsistency was due to lack of editing time and will be corrected in the 
next edition, which will appear in April.

Regarding the gaps in numbering: occasionally as the XQuery language 
evolves, an error code previously defined is no longer needed. It has been 
my policy in these cases to leave gaps rather than to reuse the error 
codes, in order to avoid possible confusion between different versions of 
the document that used the same code with different meanings.

Regards,
--Don Chamberlin




Tom Emerson <tree@dreamersrealm.net> 
Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
03/13/2005 11:01 AM

To
public-qt-comments@w3.org
cc

Subject
Error codes in XPath 2.0 specification






Section 2.3.2 of the XPath 2.0 specification [1] defines the format for 
errors as a QName with the format "err:XPYYnnnn". However, throughout 
the rest of the document, and most notably in Appendix F, the error 
category is not included in the QName. For example, syntax errors would 
be err::XPST0003 per Section 2.3.2 but is listed in Appendix F as 
err:XP0003.

Is there a reason for this discrepancy?

Also, is there an explanation for the gaps in the numeric codes?

Thanks in advance for your insight,

     -tree

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xpath20-20050211
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 17:58:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:23 UTC