W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2005

RE: FS quantifiers

From: Paul J. Lucas <plucas@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:07:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
cc: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503022006060.5731@mini1.pauljlucas.org>

 	It was a request *only* for the rationale of the change (just
 	like I originally said).  It it not a request for a
 	clarification; it is not alluding to any possible bug.

 	- Paul

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Paul Cotton wrote:

> ... adding Paul since I doubt he is subscribed to the comments list.
>
> /paulc
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniela Florescu
>> Sent: February 28, 2005 8:19 AM
>> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: FS quantifiers
>>
>>
>> Dear Paul,
>>
>> On 2004/5/13 you sent the following question:
>>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004May/0029.html
>>
>> Is your question a simple request for clarification or does it point
> to a
>> bug in
>> the definition of quantifiers in the Formal Semantics ? In the second
> case,
>> could you please give us more details on the potential problems that
> you
>> see ?
>>
>> thanks, best regards,
>> Dana Florescu
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 04:07:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:23 UTC